Analytical Rescaling of Polymer Dynamics from Mesoscale Simulations

Analytical Rescaling of Polymer Dynamics from Mesoscale Simulations

I. Y. Lyubimov, J. McCarty, A. Clark, and M. G. Guenza*
Department of Chemistry and Institute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA

We present a theoretical approach to scale the artificially fast dynamics of simulated coarse-grained
polymer liquids down to its realistic value. As coarse-graining affects entropy and dissipation,
two factors enter the rescaling: inclusion of intramolecular vibrational degrees of freedom, and
rescaling of the friction coefficient. Because our approach is analytical, it is general and transferable.
Translational and rotational diffusion of unentangled and entangled polyethylene melts, predicted
from mesoscale simulations of coarse-grained polymer melts using our rescaling procedure, are in
quantitative agreement with united atom simulations and with experiments.

I. INTRODUCTION

The development of a systematic approach to bridge
time scales between different hierarchical levels of de-
scription is an important goal in many areas of the
physics of complex systems. pQ Furthermore, understand-
ing the dynamics of polymeric liquids is relevant for many
technological applications. Polymeric materials are pro-
cessed in their liquid state, and the custom tailoring of
new materials requires detailed predictions of their me-
chanical and dynamical properties to be made based on
their chemical structure. To this end, molecular dy-
namics (MD) simulations shed light on the properties
of complex systems; however, MD is limited by the pre-
cision of the calculations, which degrades with the num-
ber of computer iterations. [5] Quantitative predictions of
the dynamics of unentangled polymer liquids are pos-
sible through simulation runs that are computationally
demanding because the polymer diffusion coefficient, D,
scales with the degree of polymerization, N, as D oc TV -1 .
Even more demanding are simulations of liquids of long,
entangled, polymeric chains, where the diffusion coeffi-
cient scales as D oc N~ 2 . For entangled polymer liquids
it is therefore difficult to obtain well-equilibrated sam-
ples or to simulate the system for several relaxation cy-
cles, which would improve the precision of the calculated
time-correlation functions.

To reach the long time and length scales of interest,
special strategies need to be employed. For example,
some gain in computational time has been achieved by
speeding up the equilibration process through an end-
bridging Monte Carlo algorithm. [3] Moreover, if only
qualitative, and not quantitative, predictions are sought,
it is possible to adopt simplified intra- and intermolcc-
ular potentials, which can speed up each simulation
step,[H [5J or purely phenomenological coarse-grained
descriptions, which reproduce the expected dynamical
scaling behavior. [51 [5] However, quantitative computa-
tional methods that precisely relate chemical structure
to the long-time properties of the polymeric liquid are

'Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic
mail: mguenza@uoregon.edu

still lacking.

There is a need for computationally efficient, predictive
methods to simulate polymer liquids and complex fluids
in the long-time regime. The strategy we are pursuing
here is to develop coarse-graining methods and dynami-
cal rescaling procedures which start from first principles
theory. [5] The goal is to obtain quantitative predictions
of real polymer dynamics directly from properly rescaled
fast mesoscale (MS) simulations of coarse-grained liquids.

In a coarse-grained description, the system is specified
by a set of relevant mesoscopic variables while smaller
length scale variables are omitted. [9] This is done at the
expense of entropy and dissipation (friction), which are
underestimated by coarse-graining. [7] Because of the re-
duced molecular degrees of freedom and the simplified
energy landscape, MS-MD simulations require less com-
putational time than atomistic simulations of the same
systems. [HI H0HI1] However, because the effective energy
landscape of the coarse-grained representation is artifi-
cially smooth, MS-MD simulations predict accelerated
dynamics, which need to be rescaled to produce realistic
values.

The enhanced diffusion in coarse-grained systems
arises from the "soft" nature of the intermolecular poten-
tial. This is advantageous in enabling larger time steps
to be used in integrating the equations of motion, and an
efficient sampling of the energy landscape, which leads to
good statistical averages of the structural properties on
the large scale. [13] However, the measured dynamics of
coarse-grained systems is too fast, and as of yet, there is
no clear procedure to quantitatively re-scale these accel-
erated dynamics.

In an effort to develop quantitative rescaling meth-
ods, it is custom to build a numerical "calibration curve"
obtained from direct comparison of MS-MD time cor-
relation functions with atomistic simulations. The "cali-
bration curves" are parametric, normal mode dependent,
and specific to the system against which they are opti-
mized, as well as to its thermodynamic conditions. Build-
ing these parametric curves in part defeats the purpose of
the coarse-graining procedure as it requires running many
atomistic simulations to optimize the fitting parameters.
If the level of coarse-graining is low, i.e. if the average is
performed over a small number of atoms, the correction
to the dynamics is only perturbative and the paramet-

2

ric rescaling works well.[T3] This explains the success of
united-atom (UA) simulations. (3J [15] However, because
the gain in computational time increases with the level
of coarse-graining, simulations of slightly coarse-grained
systems, e.g. UA-MD, afford a limited gain in time and
length scales.

The most gain in computational efficiency is achieved
through large-scale coarse-graining, as the one adopted in
this paper. This is most useful when studying bulk phys-
ical quantities, e.g. viscosity, or systems with large-scale
fluctuations, e.g. approaching spinodal decomposition.
[16) Once simulations of heavily coarse-grained systems
are combined with local scale simulations in a multiscale
procedure, they provide the complete description of the
system at all lengthscales of interest. [17]

This paper presents a derivation of a first-principles
approach to rescale the dynamics from MS-MD simu-
lations of a coarse-grained polymer melt to the values
of an atomistic description. The rescaling is analytical,
general and transferible. The favorable comparison with
atomistic simulations and experimental data in different
thermodynamic conditions supports the validity of the
proposed procedure. The theoretical basis of the rescal-
ing rests on the fact that the accelerated dynamics is a
result of the missing dissipation due to the eliminated
degrees of freedom.

The paper is organized as following. In Section 2
we briefly review our coarse-grained model, while the
coarse-grained potential and mesoscale simulations are
described in Section 3. In the following section we present
our atomistic model and the calculation of the energy
due to the internal degrees of freedom. Rescaling of
the friction coefficient is discussed in Section 5, followed
by a comparison of the diffusion coefficients predicted
from MS-MD simulations after rescaling, with united-
atom simulation and experimental data. A brief discus-
sion concludes the paper.

The form factors entering Eq.Q are approximated by

uj cm (k) = iVe'T and uj mm {k) = N/(l + k 2 R 2 g /2),
which is the Pade approximant of the Debye function
uj mm {k) = 2N(e- k2R l + k 2 R 2 g - l)/(fc 4 i?4). For the
monomer-monomer total intermolecular correlation func-
tion h mm (k), we use the thread-limit polymer reference
interaction site model description, [T!5] in which h mm (k) —
W(l + £p fc2 )(! + k2 &- Here ; £p is tlie length scale of
density fluctuations defined as t;^ 1 = + ^ p _1 , with
£ c = Rg/y/2 the length scale of the correlation hole, and
£' p = R g /(2irp* s ) with p* = p s R 3 g being the reduced molec-
ular number density. The number density of soft colloidal
particles p s = p/N with p being the monomer density
and h = (e p /e - 1)1 Ps-

The structure of the coarse-grained polymer liquid is
described by the total distribution function, [8] approxi-
mated for polymer chains with N > 30 as

which results from the analytical Fourier transform of
h(k). The structure of the liquid on length scales of the
order of the polymer radius-of-gyration and larger, is well
described by Eq.Q, which is in quantitative agreement
with both atomistic and coarse-grained simulations.^
The coarse-grained description of Eq.|2]) is thermody-
namically consistent with the atomistic representation,
e.g. of the liquid compressibility. Because the total
correlation function of the coarse-grained representation
is analytical, i.e. it depends explicitly on density and
molecular parameters, it is also general and state-point
transferable.

II. COARSE-GRAIN MODEL

Our coarse-grained representation models polymers as
interacting soft-colloidal particles with repulsive interac-
tion of the order of the size of the macromolecule, de-
fined by the radius-of-gyration, i? ff .[B] The total distribu-
tion function is derived from the solution of a generalized
Ornstein-Zernikc equation, treating coarse-grained sites
as auxiliary sites, and atomic sites as real sites|18j. In
reciprocal space, the total distribution function is

h(k) = [w cm (fc)/cj r

l (k)fh r -

\k)

(1)

where the superscript "mm" identifies the monomer-
monomer distribution, while "cm" indicates the distri-
bution of monomers with respect to the center-of-mass.
Eq.(T]) is solved by assuming a Gaussian description
of the intramolecular site distribution, which is an ac-
cepted approximation for polymers in a liquid state.

III. COARSE-GRAINED POTENTIAL AND
MESOSCALE SIMULATIONS

Each soft-colloidal particle interacts with other colloids
through an effective potential of the range of the overall
polymer dimension, R g . While hard-sphere systems are
best described by a Percus-Yevick closure, the Hyper-
Netted Chain (HNC) closure works best for systems with
soft potentials, [20] including the mesoscopically coarse-
grained polymer melts investigated here, [HI [21] aud poly-
mer coils in dilute or semidilute solutions. [H] The HNC
potential between a pair of coarse-grained units is de-
rived by applying the closure j3v{r) — h(r) — ln[h(r) +
1] — c(r), where the direct correlation function is de-
fined by the Ornstein-Zernike relation in reciprocal space
c(k) = h(k)/(l +M(fc)).[23]

The potential between two spheres is calculated nu-
merically, after Fourier transform, from the analytical
expression, Eq.Q, by adopting the Debye form of the

3

monomer intramolecular distribution, u> mrn (k). The De-
bye approximation has been shown to better represent
simulation data than its Pade approximant. 2lj Tabu-
lated HNC potentials are input to the mesoscale simula-
tions.

MS-MD simulations of polymer liquids are performed
in the microcanonical ensemble, where each molecule is
represented as an interacting soft-colloidal particle. In
the initialization step, all particles are placed on a lattice
with periodic boundary conditions. Each site is given an
initial velocity and subsequently, the system is evolved
using a velocity Verlet integrator. Equilibrium is induced
in the ensemble by rescaling the velocity at regular in-
tervals until the desired average temperature is reached.
At this stage, velocity rescaling is discontinued and tra-
jectories are collected over a traversal of ~ 8R g , while
the temperature is monitored to assure that it fluctuates
around the desired equilibrium value. Because of the
form of Eq. ^ , the simulation uses reduced quantities of
distance, R g = 1, mass, m = 1, and energy, ksT = 1.

A typical MS-MD simulation for our model is per-
formed on a single-CPU workstation, and consists of
~ 3000 polymers, evolving for a duration of ~ 4 hours.
The MS-MD simulation provides identical structural in-
formation to that of the analogous atomistic or united-
atom (UA) simulations on length scales equal and larger
than the polymer R g . However, the MS-MD requires a
much smaller computational power than the atomistic
and UA-MD simulation, which is typically performed on
a liquid of ~ 500 polymers, on a parallel supercomputer.
The convenient requirements in computational power of
the MS-MD simulation allows one to increase consider-
ably the number of particles and the simulation box size
without dramatically affecting the computational time,
thus improving the precision on the large-scale data col-
lected.

IV. MAPPING OF THE ATOMISTIC

DESCRIPTION ONTO A
FREELY- ROTATING-CHAIN MODEL

The correction in Hclmhotz free energy, which accounts
for the discarded internal degrees of freedom, is calcu-
lated starting from the atomistic representation of the liq-
uid, where each chain is described as a collection of beads
connected by springs defined by an effective intramolecu-
lar quadratic potential U (r) = 3ksT/ (2l 2 ) X)fj=i ^-i,j r i '
Tj. Here A is the connectivity matrix, which represents
the structure and local flexibility of the polymer, the
position of unit i in a chain of N beads, and 1^ = r j+i —
the bond vector connecting two adjacent beads. [24] For
polyethylene melts, each polymer is represented as a
freely-rotating-chain (FRC), finite in size, with semiflcx-
ibility parameter g = ((1, • = 0.785 and

fixed bond length I — 1.54A. This bead-and-spring model
of the FRC has been shown to represent correctly the dy-
namics of polyethylene melts as measured in united-atom

simulations [23] and in experiments. [26] A FRC model
was also successfully adopted to model the dynamics of
polymer melts with different molecular architectures. [2"T]
and even proteins, [M] [25] once the proper semiflexibility
parameters are selected.

To map the MS-MD simulation onto a real system, the
reduced unit of time needs to be properly rescaled. Be-
cause energy is dissipated in internal degrees of freedom
in the atomistic representation, the contribution due to
the internal vibrational modes is included in the coarse-
grained representation by rescaling the time in the MS-
MD simulation, t, by the amount of internal free energy
dispersed in vibrational modes in the atomistic descrip-
tion as t — tR g y/3mN/(2kBT), with the particle mass,
m, and size R g . By rescaling the internal free energy, we
accounts for the change in entropy in the coarse-grained
description. In the next section we derive the friction
rescaling.

V. RESCALING OF THE FRICTION
COEFFICIENT

To account for the change in dissipation caused by
coarse-graining, we start from the diffusion coefficient
measured in the MS-MD simulation, D^ IS , and we de-
rive the center-of-mass (cm) diffusion coefficient of the
polymer, D cmi through the rescaling of the friction as

D cm = D? IS ( s /(N( m ) . (3)

The correction factor is calculated from the ratio of the
cm friction in the soft colloid representation £ s and the
cm friction in the atomistic representation N£ m , with
Cm the monomer friction. Each friction coefficient is
evaluated by solving the memory function in the corre-
sponding Generalized Langevin Equation. These mem-
ory function definitions result from the straightforward
application of Mori-Zwanzig projection operators to the
Liouvillc equation, where either the monomer (atomistic
description) or the center-of-mass (soft colloid descrip-
tion) of the polymer are assumed to be the "relevant
slow variables." [21 [M]

In the soft colloid representation the friction coefficient
is defined as

Q={p s r dt I dv f dv'g(r)g(r')F(r)F(r')v-v'

6 Jo J J ^

x J dRS(R;t)S(\r-r' + R|;t),

where f3 = 1/kgT, g(r) = h(r) + 1 is the radial dis-
tribution function, F(r) = (din g(r) / 'dr) is the total
force exerted by the surrounding fluid on the colloid, and
S(k) = 1 + p s h(k) is the structure factor of the fluid sur-
rounding the colloid. The unit vectors f and f ' define the
direction of exerted forces.

4

In Eq.Q, the projected dynamics has been substituted
with the real (unprojected) dynamics, which is a valid
approximation when the Langevin equation is expressed
as a function of slow variables for the diffusive regime. [53]
In the long-time regime, the relaxation of the liquid is
dominated by the polymer ccnter-of-mass diffusion, D,
here represented by the cm of the colloidal particle. In
Fourier space the dynamic structure factor of the liquid
reads S(k; t) ~ S(k)exp(—k 2 Dt). Evaluating the integral
with use of Eq.Q gives

D/3( s KAyfrp,R g § ( 1 + f-

1183
~507

p s h

507
512

679^ 2 ,o

piK

1024 Hs

(5)

Eq.© expresses the friction coefficient of a soft col-
loidal particle.

In the atomistic description, the monomer friction co-
efficient is defined by the memory function as

E f dT \p J dr J dr'g(r)g(r')F(r)F(r')

j,i=l

xf J dRSij{R; t)S(\r - r' + R|; t) ,

(6)

where the dynamic structure factor of the surrounding
liquid is approximated as S(k;t) S{k)exp{—k 2 Dt) =
[ui(k) + ph(k)]exp(—k 2 Dt), with uj(k) being the in-
tramolecular static structure factor. This expression for
S(k;t) assumes that in the long time regime the relax-
ation of the liquid is dominated by the polymer center-
of-mass diffusion, consistently with the soft-colloid rep-
resentation.

To evaluate Eq.(|6|, we approximate the potential as
an effective hard-core potential with a diameter d to be
defined. [2"5] In hard-core fluids, g(r)F(r) = g(d)j3~ 1 8(r —
d). Working in reciprocal space, the integrals in Eq. ([6|
can be performed analytically to give an expression for
the dynamical quantity D(3C, m depending on two length
scales: R g , and d. The result is lengthy, and it is not
reported here. [53] The values of R g used are the ones
reported in Tables [I] and [rJ]

The monomer hard-core diameter, d = 2.1 A, is identi-
cal for all the samples, and is obtained by reproducing the
scaling with N of an unentangled melt, Z?/3£ m = 1/N, for
the PE 44 sample. This sample is chosen because its de-
gree of polymerization is smaller than the entanglement
one, N e — 130, and it is large enough to ensure Gaussian
chain statistics. Once d is defined, it is not changed for
any other system considered, either unentangled or en-
tangled. This is the only parameter that has to be fixed
in our approach. Theoretically predicted values for un-
entangled systems recover the correct scaling behavior as

ND(3( m w 1. For entangled systems, we solve Eq.([6]) by
including a one-loop perturbation of the diffusion coeffi-
cient. For these entangled systems ND(3( m cx A -1 , in
agreement with the known scaling behavior.

VI. COMPARISON OF PREDICTED
DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS WITH SIMULATIONS
AND EXPERIMENTS

To test our approach we compare the rescaled dynam-
ics, predicted from mesoscale simulations, with experi-
ments and UA-MD simulations. Each sample that we
investigate is in well-defined thermodynamic conditions
of density and temperature, and has a specific radius
of gyration. Those quantities enter as an input to our
mesoscale simulation, and also in the expressions for the
rescaling of the energy and friction coefficient (see Tables
|l]and|n|.

Comparison with simulation data are limited here to
United-Atom simulations, but our theory is general and
comparison could be made with atomistic simulations
as well. The UA-MD simulations reported in this pa-
per cover a regime from unentangled, [15 to slightly en-
tangled dynamics (two entanglements per chain). [3] We
use as an input of our approach the radius of gyration,
as measured in each simulation. These values are very
close to the theoretical R g values calculated using a FRC
model with semiflcxibility parameter g — 0.785.

The experimental samples considered in this paper [26
cover a region at the crossover from unentangled to en-
tangled dynamics comparable to the one in UA-MD sim-
ulations. However, the values of the radius-of-gyration
for those samples are not known, because only the de-
gree of polymerization is reported. For those samples we
assume as input values of R g those calculated using a
FRC approach.

The predicted cm diffusion coefficient of a polymer
chain, D cm is compared in Figure [T] against the data from

TABLE I: MS-MD Parameters - UA-MD data

Polymer

N

T [K]

p [sites/A 3 ]

R g [A]

PE30 a

30

400

0.0317

7.97

PE44 a

44

400

0.0324

10.50

PE48 b

48

450

0.0314

10.54

PE66 a

GG

448

0.0329

13.32

PE78 b

78

450

0.0321

14.35

PE96 a

96

448

0.0328

16.79

PE142 b

142

450

0.0327

20.51

PE174 b

174

450

0.0328

22.92

PE224 b

224

450

0.0329

26.28

PE270 b

270

450

0.0330

29.27

PE320 b

320

450

0.0330

31.31

° data from ref. [15]; b data from ref. [3]

5

TABLE II: MS-MD Parameters - Experimental Data [T =
509K, p = 0.0315 [sites/A 3 ]. Data from Ref.|26]]

Polymer TV i^ flC [A]

PE36 36 10.07

PE72 72 14.82

PE106 106 18.20

PE130 130 20.25

PE143 143 21.27

PE192 192 24.77

PE242 242 27.88

simulations, [51 [TS] and from experiments. jUj We also
show, as a guide to the eye, lines with the scaling behavior
of unentangled and entangled systems. The agreement
between calculated and measured diffusion coefficients is
good over a range of the degree-of-polymerization, cov-
ering unentangled as well as entangled polymer melts.
Because each simulation and experimental value is taken
in slightly different thermodynamic conditions, the data
points do not perfectly align along the lines of the scal-
ing exponents in the figure. However we observe a good
agreement between predicted theoretical values and mea-
sured ones in simulations or experiments.

i<r

Q

10°

: (a)

i -

i i'

: (b)

io 2

SO

.d

^10'
Q

t :

10°

1 I :

io 2 io 3

N

FIG. 1: Plot of diffusion coefficients as a function of degree
of polymerization, TV. Comparison between the theoretically
predicted values (triangle), simulations (square) from [51 115] .
and experiments (circle) from [26] and references therein.
Also shown is the scaling for unentangled, TV" 1 (dot-dashed
line), and entangled systems, TV -2 (dashed line)

To test further the validity of our procedure, we calcu-
late the decay of the rotational time-correlation function
for the molecular end-to-end vector with input parame-

ters for polyethylene and the rescaled monomer friction
coefficient £ = fc^T '/ '(TV D cm ), and compare it against
UA-MD simulations (see Figure [2]). Predicted and mea-
sured decays are in excellent agreement for the unen-
tangled samples, suggesting that the proposed procedure
holds for different normal modes of motion.

o 2 4 6 8 10
t[ns]

FIG. 2: Normalized rotational time decorrelation function for
the end-to-end vector for the semiflexible chains with rescaled
friction (solid lines) compared against simulations (symbols)
for polyethylene melts of increasing length; TV = 30 (circles),
TV = 66 (squares), TV = 96 (triangles)

VII. CONCLUSIONS

Mesocale simulations of coarse-grained systems are be-
coming increasingly important, as they are computa-
tionally efficient and allow for the study of systems on
larger length and time scales than their atomistic coun-
terparts. However, while structural properties on large
length scales are well described by MS-MD simulations,
the dynamics is unrealistically fast due to the simplified
free energy landscape. In this paper we have presented
an analytical, first-principles, approach to scale the dy-
namics measured in mesoscale simulations down to re-
alistic atomistic values. The rescaling procedure takes
into account the averaged internal degrees of freedom and
enhanced dissipation due to the coarse-grainining proce-
dure. The agreement of predicted long-time dynamics
with data from simulations and experiments is quanti-
tative. Whereas previous efforts at dynamical rescaling
have used numerical calibration curves, which are specific
of the system under study, our approach is analytical and
thus general and transferable: it is readily applicable to
systems with different thermodynamic parameters and
to polymer chains of increasing degree of polymerization
crossing from the unentangled to the entangled regime.
The development of a general scheme to rescale the dy-
namics from MS-MD simulations promises to be useful
in multiscale modeling techniques and fast equilibration

6

methods employed in computer simulations of complex
fluids.

In summary, the development of schemes to rescale the
dynamics from MS-MD simulations will certainly be ben-
eficial in the advancement of multiscale modeling tech-
niques of complex fluids. Equilibrium and non equilib-
rium simulations of polymer melts with different architec-
tures should be natural implementations of the approach
for future work. It should also be possible to extend this
model to rescale systems represented at an intermedi-
ate level of coarse-graining as collections of soft colloidal
beads, so that the internal dynamics of entangled chains

can be simulated.

ACKNOWLEDGNEMTS

We acknowledge support from the National Science
Foundation. Simulation trajectories for the UA-MD sim-
ulations were kindly provided by Gary G. Grest and Vla-
sis G. Mavrantzas. We thank Glenn T. Evans for the
careful reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

[1] M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. A 76, 022104 [16
(2007).

[2] D. Frenkel and B. Smith, Understanding Molecular Sim- [17
ulation. From Algorithms to Applications (Academic
Press, London, 2002). [18;

[3] A. Uhlherr, M. Doxastakis, V. G. Mavrantzas, D. N.

Theodorou, S. J. Leak, N. E. Adam and P. E. Nyberg, [19
Europhys. Lett. 57, 506 (2002).

[4] M. Kroger and S. Hess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1128 (2000). [20

[5] S. K. Sukumaran and A. E. Likhtman, Macromolecules
42, 4300 (2009).

[6] J. T. Padding, and W. J. Briels, J. Chem. Phys. 117, [21
925 (2002).

[7] H. C. Ottinger Beyond Equilibrium Thermodynamics [22

(Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.2005).
[8] G. Yatsenko, E. J. Sambriski, M. A. Nemirovskaya and [23

M. Guenza, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257803 (2004).
[9] M. Karttunen, I. Vattulainen, and A. Lukkarinen (eds.), [24
Novel Methods in Soft Matter Simulations; Lect. Notes
Phys. 640 (Spinger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004). [25
[10] T. A. Knotts IV, N. Rathore, D. C. Schwartz and J. J. [26

de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 084901 (2007).
[11] M. L. Klein and W. Shinoda, Science 321, 798 (2008).
[12] G. Milano and F. Muller-Plathe, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, [27;
18609 (2005)

[13] S. O. Nielsen, C. F. Lopez, G. Srinivas and M. L. Klein [28

J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, R481 (2004).
[14] V. A. Harmandaris and K. Kremer, Macromolecules 42,

791 (2009). [29;
[15] M. Mondello and G. S. Grest, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9327

(1997).

J. McCarty, I. Y. Lyubimov and M. G. Guenza, Macro-
molecules 43, 3964 (2010).

J. McCarty, I. Y. Lyubimov and M. G. Guenza, J. Phys.
Chem. B 113, 11876 (2009).

V. Krakoviack, J. -P. Hansen and A. A. Louis, Europhys.
Lett. 58, 53 (2002).

K. S. Schweizer and J. G. Curro, Adv. Chem. Phys. 98,
1 (1997).

McQuarric, D. A. Statistical Mechanics; University Sci-
ence Books: Sausalito, C. A., 2000 (see discussion in Sec-
tion 13-9).

E. J. Sambriski, G. Yatsenko, M. A. Nemiroskaya and M.
G. Guenza, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 234902 (2006).
A. A. Louis, P. G. Bolhuis, J. P. Hansen and E. J. Meijer,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2522 (2000).

J. -P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liq-
uids (Academic Press, London, 1991).
M. G. Guenza, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 033101
(2008), and references therein.
M. Guenza Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 25901 (2002).
M. Zamponi, A. Wischnewski, M. Monkenbusch, L. Will-
ner, D. Richter, P. Falus, B. Farago and M. G. Guenza J.
Phys. Chem. 112, 16220 (2008), and references therein.
E. J. Sambriski, G. Yatsenko, M. A. Nemiroskaya and M.
G. Guenza J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 19, 205115 (2007).

E. Caballero-Manrique, J. K. Brey, W. A. Deutschman,

F. W. Dahlquist and M. G. Guenza Biophys. J. 93, 4128
(2007).

The mathematical notebook with the solution is available
upon request.